Black Robed Terrorists: Justice Has Been Goosed, Groped and Buggered
How a Leaked Memo, Marching Judges, and Manufactured Outrage Signal the Last Stand of the Guilty
A newly revealed memo confirms that at least some federal judges had already formed their opinions about the Trump administration before ever stepping into a courtroom. Let that register: the very people sworn to uphold the Constitution, to act as neutral arbiters of justice, had prejudged. And not in private thought, but institutionally—on record.
This wasn’t just a lapse in ethics. It was a coordinated breach—a silent detonation at the foundation of due process. When justice is rigged before the trial begins, the courtroom becomes little more than a stage, where power cosplays as morality.
And now, at the exact moment when institutional narratives are collapsing under their weight, the memo surfaces. Not as a confession. As a cue. In the world of perception warfare, leaks aren’t mistakes. They’re moves. And to those planning the next act: tread carefully. The nation sees you, and the damage you're poised to cause—to credibility, to unity, to the very fabric of trust—is far greater than the reckoning you're trying to outrun. You’re not saving the system by setting it on fire. You're only proving you were never worthy of holding the match.
Behind every coordinated message campaign lies a constellation of NGOs, think tanks, media syndicates, and…
Commies gonna commie.
My gut reaction when someone points-out something done to them that's disturbing, and it's never really happened at all, is to graphically illustrate the difference between the two.
"Oh, you're complaining because you think I'm stepping on your toe? Here's a quick rabbet-punch to your throat to clear your senses...."
Onward, Christian soldiers!