Secession: The Inalienable Right of a Free People to Leave a Tyrannical Union
If you can't leave, You Ain't Free!
From the Abbeville Institute:
In the immortal words of the Declaration of Independence, “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” When that consent is withdrawn—when the government becomes the destroyer, rather than the protector, of life, liberty, and property—then the people retain the right, indeed the duty, to dissolve the political bands which have connected them to the abusers.
This principle, declared boldly in 1776 by the representatives of thirteen united colonies, was neither novel nor radical. It was a reaffirmation of the ancient, natural right of self-government, the right of any political society to withdraw from a union that tramples its liberties and violates the very trust upon which it was founded. The colonies exercised that right against the British Crown, and the Southern states, three generations later, claimed no less a right when faced with the same overbearing, unconstitutional usurpations from the federal government.
As but one representative example—drawn from the rich storehouse of pre-Revolutionary thought affirming the unquestionable legality and moral legitimacy of secession from a union of equals—consider these words from Algernon Sidney’s Discourses Concerning Government, penned nearly a century before our own Declaration and published in 1689:
“[I]t cannot be believed that rational creatures would advance one or a few of…
I have a TEXIT! sticker on my truck window, looks good with the lone star flag sticker.
Onward, Christian soldiers!
"Balkanization refers to the process of a region or state breaking down into smaller, often hostile units along ethnic, cultural, or religious lines. It typically results from historical tensions, competing national identities, and socio-political issues, leading to conflicts and instability. The term originates from the Balkan Peninsula, which experienced significant fragmentation in the early 20th century, particularly after World War I. It is often used to describe the division of a multinational state into smaller ethnically homogeneous entities. The term can also refer to ethnic conflict within multiethnic states and is sometimes used pejoratively to describe external interference in such processes." - Brave's A.I. Leo
My view is that the world is run by a cabal of secret societies that create all sides.
The US Civil War shows this. It was given superior tech like ironclad ships, just like the Nazis had but both lost. The South had a legitimate grievavce, just like Nazi, Germany. Both didn't like being bullied by foreign Jewish bankers. The right to secede was ignored just like the constitution is today where Congress via our input isn't needed to declare war. Until we face that cryptocracy rules, no one, regardless of their politics has any say. Its easier to control any group with infiltrators than any group can manage itself.
What we need is a confederacy of all localities worldwide. Our shared wnemy is communitarianism, which is a Zionist managed merger of the world into one common culture by taking over at the smallest local levels.
This is the lesson we should have learned from covid lockdowns which were global.
Government worldwide is being replaced with The Network State based on the internet.
Tech has eliminated the ability for any group to operate beyond its control so ideas about secession need to catch up.
Texas has the best shot but its way more influenced by globalism.
Geography diminishes in relevance due to tech. Now, its more about what values you share and what goals you can achieve and can you co-operate with other groups better than corporate governance can force us into compliance and acceptance.