The Big Lie About Base Renamings
(I’ve got an even better Idea than restoring the names. How about the feds turn those yankee Occupation Centers back over to the states. Then we’ll name them what we want. Y’all can quarter your occupation troops up north! Maybe Greenland? – DD)
Fight Censorship and Help Spread Mockingbird Non-Compliant News! Like, Share, Re-Post, and Subscribe! There’s a lot more to see at our main page, Dixie Drudge
When the newly-minted Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, named Fort Liberty, North Carolina “Fort Bragg” after Roland L. Bragg, a native of Maine, who served in WWI, instead of the original namesake, many were quick to excuse it saying “he did the best he could” and, or “the law prevents any military installation to be named after a Confederate”.
Poppycock. This is a misapprehension of the enabling legislation.
The Willim M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2021 (“NDAA”)1[1], Section 370’s ten clauses established the Commission, its duties of making recommendations, the scope of what was to be removed, including exclusions for grave markers, and the Secretary of Defense’s responsibilities to implement, presumably legal, recommendations, including an implementation date.
The Naming Commission’s duties included making a list of military assets that were to be removed or renamed which “commemorate the Confederate State of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate State of America”.
Students of history may notice the striking similarities between this act and the establishment of the ‘Entartete Kunst’ or list of ‘degenerate art’ created by…
Deo Vindice Resurgam! #FreeDixie