Winning the #TEXIT Debate
Logical Strategies for Self-Determination
(TNM) – When advocating for Texas independence, having the right logical frameworks at your disposal can transform an emotional argument into a compelling case for self-governance. This article is the first in our series on winning the Texit debate through strategic reasoning.
Today, we’ll focus on the arguments centered around self-determination and the fundamental right of Texans to decide their own political future. Master these approaches, and you’ll turn antagonistic conversations into productive discussions that advance our cause.
The Self-Determination Dilemma
When debating opponents of Texas independence, start with this powerful question: “Do you believe in the self-determination of the people? If a clear majority of Texans voted for independence in a fair referendum, would you respect that outcome or attempt to block it?”
This creates an immediate logical trap. If they say they would reject the referendum results, they’ve just admitted to opposing the foundational principle that legitimate authority flows from the consent of the governed – a principle enshrined in the Texas Constitution’s Article 1, Section 2: “All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority.”
Alternatively, if they claim they would respect such an outcome, they’ve conceded that Texit is a legitimate choice for Texans to make. Either way, you’ve established an important…
Fight Censorship and Help Spread Mockingbird Non-Compliant News! Like, Share, Re-Post, and Subscribe! There’s a lot more to see at our main page, Dixie Drudge
Deo Vindice Resurgam! #FreeDixie